Reading I
Genesis 6:9–13
What moral conditions are described? Distinguish the passage's actual language from a modern prediction.
The Assembly | Primary sources
Observe. Interpret. Prove. Learn to disagree without diminishing one another.
Literature and curriculum prepared · Gatherings not yet scheduledOur weekly study process follows a verified Jewish calendar. We read the Torah as primary source, identify historical and literary context, consult named Jewish interpretations, and allow thoughtful comparison without replacing the text’s Jewish setting with another tradition’s claims.
Reading I
What moral conditions are described? Distinguish the passage's actual language from a modern prediction.
Reading II
Who is included in the covenant? Name the beneficiaries exactly as described in the passage.
Reading III
How does the Tower of Babel narrative link language and power? Offer two interpretations with sources.
Practice the Observe → Infer → Prove method. Each participant writes or states one observation, one tentative interpretation, and the verse supporting it. Speaking is optional, and no one must declare theological agreement.
An observation reports what a cited verse actually says. An interpretation explains or evaluates the text and must be labeled and supported by a named source or argument.
No. The assigned reading continues through Genesis 11:32 and includes covenantal and genealogical material as well as Babel.
| Week | Text laboratory | Core inquiry |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genesis 1–2 | Creation, rest and literary structure |
| 2 | Genesis 4 | Responsibility and the neighbor |
| 3 | Genesis 6–9 | Noah and covenant |
| 4 | Genesis 11 | Language and power |
| 5 | Genesis 12; 18 | Abraham and hospitality |
| 6 | Genesis 17 | Covenantal language |
| 7 | Genesis 25–33 | Sibling responsibility |
| 8 | Genesis 37; 45 | Joseph and reconciliation |
| 9 | Exodus 1–15 | Liberation narratives |
| 10 | Exodus 20; Deuteronomy 5 | Rest and law |
| 11 | Leviticus 19 | Justice and neighbor |
| 12 | Deuteronomy 30 | Stewardship capstone |
Each scholar demonstrates correct source identification, careful quotation, fair representation of at least two named commentarial perspectives, and facilitation respectful of disagreement. Oral or written submissions are available as appropriate. Discussion attendance alone does not constitute mastery.